Multi-Tenancy Packages for Laravel: A Comparison Guide
This guide compares top Laravel multi-tenancy packages—tenancy/tenancy, stancl/tenancy, and spatie/multitenancy—outlining their features, pros, and cons. It helps developers choose the right solution based on project size, complexity, and desired flexibility.

As applications grow and serve more customers, building multi-tenant systems becomes essential—especially for SaaS platforms. Laravel, being a flexible and expressive PHP framework, supports multiple ways to implement multi-tenancy. Fortunately, several community-driven packages exist to streamline this process. In this post, we'll explore the most popular Laravel multi-tenancy packages and compare their features, benefits, and ideal use cases.
What is Multi-Tenancy?
Multi-tenancy is a software architecture where a single application instance serves multiple tenants (clients), each with isolated data and sometimes even configurations. There are three main strategies:
- Single database, shared schema
- Single database, separate schema
- Separate databases per tenant
Choosing the right package depends on which of these strategies you intend to follow.
Top Laravel Multi-Tenancy Packages
1. tenancy/tenancy
- Type: Separate database or shared database
- Highlights:
- Mature and widely used in the Laravel ecosystem
- Supports central and tenant-specific domains
- Built-in support for queues, events, migrations
- Ideal for: Large SaaS apps that require tenant isolation at the database level
- Pros:
- Excellent documentation
- Event-driven architecture
- Cons:
- Can be overkill for simpler apps
- Learning curve due to complexity
2. stancl/tenancy
- Type: Separate DB, optionally shared DB
- Highlights:
- Modern and actively maintained
- Zero-downtime tenant creation
- Simple API with auto-identification of tenants via domains or subdomains
- Ideal for: Most SaaS platforms, especially new Laravel projects
- Pros:
- Cleaner, Laravel-like syntax
- Less opinionated than tenancy/tenancy
- Cons:
- Slightly less mature than tenancy/tenancy but rapidly growing
3. spatie/multitenancy
- Type: Flexible – supports multiple tenancy styles
- Highlights:
- Lightweight and modular
- Works well with Spatie’s ecosystem of packages
- Emphasizes control and customization
- Ideal for: Developers who want to build their own logic using reusable building blocks
- Pros:
- Minimalistic, clean codebase
- Highly customizable
- Cons:
- Requires more setup and manual wiring
Comparison Table
Feature / Package | tenancy/tenancy | stancl/tenancy | spatie/multitenancy |
---|---|---|---|
Separate DB Support | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Shared DB Support | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Subdomain Routing | ✅ | ✅ | Manual |
Ease of Use | ⚠️ Complex | ✅ Simple | ⚠️ Intermediate |
Extensibility | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Active Maintenance | 🟡 Moderate | 🟢 Active | 🟢 Active |
Docs Quality | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Conclusion: Which One Should You Choose?
- Go with
stancl/tenancy
if you want a clean and modern multi-tenancy implementation that plays well with Laravel. - Choose
tenancy/tenancy
for enterprise-grade setups with complex isolation and domain routing needs. - Use
spatie/multitenancy
if you prefer a hands-on, customizable approach to tenancy with a modular structure.
Multi-tenancy is complex, but with the right package, Laravel makes it very manageable. Before choosing a package, consider your app's architecture, expected growth, and team expertise.
Happy Coding! 😊